Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Economics’

Sobering speech by Serbia’s c.bank chief

April 28th, 2009

Serbian central bank Governor Radovan Jelasic told the IMF and World Bank panel that he sees economic gloom for Serbia in 2009 that will extend over into 2010.

“What do I expect at the end of 2009?” asked the Governor rhetorically in his speech to the panel titled Global Crisis in Europe and Central Asia.

Then he answered:

I am afraid, nothing good.  Fiscal income will deteriorate even further while the shadow economy will gain in importance.  Governments will focus almost exclusively on financing current consumption (wages and pensions), even through accumulation of fresh debt, while capital investments will be substantially cut back.

The Governor said that banks will “face a deteriorating loan portfolio” and that their primary preoccupation will be refinancing bad loans, loan more to the government, cut its costs and hoard cash.

As there is no chapter 11 type of creditors’ protection scheme, the number of bankruptcies [the Governor probably meant liquidation] will increase as well.

The Governor also warned of a regional financial contagion and urged that Austria extends its promise not to disengage its banks from the entire region and not just Serbia.

Once we have finalized our deal, I hope in a matter of days, the deal makers should focus on all other countries as spill over effect is very large:  a rumor regarding any bank in Serbia or Croatian circulates in the region in matter of hours and could cause irreversible damages.

The Governor appealed to the politicians to stop spreading false expectations [see my previous blog].

The entire speech is available here.

Economics

Is Serbia setting up for a run on its currency?

October 6th, 2008

States and countries have became the latest victims of the financial hemorrhaging that is sweeping the globe.

Over the weekend the debt laden California is seeking emergency loans from Washington in order to avoid bankruptcy while Iceland is doing the same kind of begging from their neighbors to rescue them from reckless lending their banks did.

Bankers are suddenly alarmed that Pakistan may default on its debt as its debt-to-reserve ratio rose from 30% to 32%.

Turkey’s debt-to-reserve ratio of 31% is already alarming the IMF and may table that country at this week’s IMF/World Bank meeting in the US.

If what is happening to these countries is any suggestive what may await the debt strapped “developing” Serbia, the picture, at least for next several weeks, may look very alarming.

Serbia’s public debt obligations of $3.7 billion are a whopping 39% of its foreign reserves of $9.5 billion that the Central Bank has in the vault.

The larger the ratio the less money country has come bill payment time.

In addition, Serbia’s private debt is over $20 billion and to pay their payments, private firms will soon seek to convert their domestic Dinars from the Central Bank and deplete the savings even more.

The way to reduce this percent and have more money for paying bills, is for Serbia to export more, or attract more foreign investment or borrow on more favorable terms to pay its bills.

Serbia is paying only lip service to exports, globe trots for the diminishing pool of investment money and is running out of favorable borrowing terms.

IMFs recent report on its visit to Serbia assesses that “exports are not keeping up with surging imports” and has already warned of Serbia’s “unsustainable external current account deficit.”

The word “unsustainable” is often a code word to speculators that country’s currency may soon take a hit.

This outflow of reserves, says IMF, is offset by “abundant capital inflows [that] have, at least until now, largely defused macroeconomic tensions.”

But what about after now?

With borrowing terms now reduced to only 24 hours at a time, it will be a long time when banks will become willing to borrow long so that a country may pay off its short funding demands.

IMFs optimistic prognosis that Serbia’s “real GDP to continue to expand at a robust 6-7 percent during 2008-09″ is then predicated more on hopes then reality that foreign investors will have enough money in the future to pump into Serbia’s economy and keep its local currency propped up.

So, we have a 1-2-3 knock out set up on the currency - unsustainable trade deficit, prospect of diminishing foreign investment inflow and tight borrowing terms - all a culmination of an 8 year old borrow-and-spend policy.

Economics