Comments for M. Bozinovich

Comment on On the roundup of Serbian priests by Dragan

Dragan — Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:22:20 +0000

very informative article.You know that if the Serbian government spoke out against Artemije that he is a righteous man.God bless him.

Comment on On the roundup of Serbian priests by Chuck

Chuck — Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:14:46 +0000

Thank you! Finally, someone has shown the courage to print the truth of what is being done to Bishop Artemije in the name of Serbia’s integration into the western system. No doubt that Jeremic and the pro-NATO crowd had a hand in this debacle. All one has to do to get an idea of where Vuk stands on the issue is read some of his past pronouncements. He is certainly no “wolf.” Perhaps he is a lamb being prepared by Kosovo Muslims for ritual slaughter on the alter of Natural Albania. It is, perhaps, self-evident which side of the argument Tadic and his EU masters support. Heroes like Bishop Artemije who gladly give of themselves for God and Country are, as they say, a vanishing breed in Serbia.

Comment on The “Montenegrin Conspiracy” by Kec

Kec — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:35:58 +0000

Hey Bijelo Polje, you just said the same thing as the article and added occupation.

Good to know that Nikola II is not even Orthodox and the author should have mentioned that as part of the conspiracy.

Comment on The “Montenegrin Conspiracy” by Bijelo Polje

Bijelo Polje — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:38:01 +0000

Montenegrins are Serbs, and all Serbs are under foreign occupation.

Stop stereotyping and stating outright lies. The “prince” Nicholas Petrovic is half French, half Serbian and labeled him self a “Roman Catholic Yugoslav” before the breakup of Yugoslavia. Hence, he has nothing to do with Montenegro, nor does he know Montenegrin history or anything else for that matter. All of his ancestors were extreme and staunch Serbian nationalists, and they indeed did deserve to rule a unified Serbian state because they were better than the Karadjordjevics in every possible way.

BTW, the majority of Montenegrins consider themselves Serbs, even today, despite insurmountable odds posed by 65 years of communist propaganda and now from the US-NATO puppet government. There is only one church in Montenegro, and the so-called “montenegrin church” is nothing more than a media-propaganda stunt.

Does the genius who wrote this article take a moment to consider that all Serbian lands are occupied and without real leaders?

Comment on What Serbia concession on Srebrenica means by Kara Nikola

Kara Nikola — Fri, 02 Apr 2010 23:43:28 +0000

Sladjana, Mr. Bozinovic does not think Serbs are bad; he is a Serb, and not one of those sell-out Serbs currently presiding over the Serbian government and who voted for the resolution.
He does not support the law and was trying to point out that Muslims were killed only after they had lost Srebrenica which they had acquired through cleansing of the Serb population in the city.

Comment on What Serbia concession on Srebrenica means by Sladjana

Sladjana — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:53:35 +0000

with all due respect mr. Bozinovic, but I think that no one apologized for many Serbs that have been killed in Bosnia.

This law is bad because Serbia is apologizing for things that did not even happen in its country.

Don’t you think that, mr. Bozinovic, or do you think that Serbs are bad?

Comment on What Serbia concession on Srebrenica means by Mabuballah

Mabuballah — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:42:32 +0000

Srebrenica was a fraud. (Read renowned reporter Peter Brock in “Media Cleansing …” and Canadian Gen. Lewis MacKenzie, UN commander in the early ’90′s on the subject.) If the Dutch soldiers were at fault, how come the only people to actually attack them were Muslims?
Trnopolje was a fraud by British ITN TV also, as were the market and other bombings in Sarajevo. So was the entire cadre of Western leadership, for that matter. Getting an apology from the present Serb “Parliament” is tantamount to getting a “confession” out of a concentration camp prisoner.

Comment on What Serbia concession on Srebrenica means by Big Frank

Big Frank — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 02:58:51 +0000

When will Bill Clinton apologize for the killing of 2000+ innocent Serbian civilians during the NATO bombings in that phony war to decimate the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia? The war to chop up countries and bring subservient vassal states into the EU.Serbia again gets kicked around and treated like dirt As an American am still sickened by the suffering of the Serbs in Kosovo and the destruction of their homes,churches,and culture. The US is on the wrong side in this conflict, and has lost a lot of respect in the global community.

Comment on VIDEO: Dodik removes Bosnian Muslim flag hoisted in front of him by trebo grad

trebo grad — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:19:01 +0000

Ovo je izvuceno iz konteksta i iskoristeno da se covjeku pripise nesto sto uopste nije mislio.On je u tom trenutku telefonirao i nesvjesno pokanuo zastavicu koja je pala.

Comment on Kosovo and the missing Pope by DP

DP — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:13:12 +0000

You refer to the country on the north of Greece with the name Macedonia. This country is however temporarily called FYROM. Please do use this name when you either refer to the ancient Greek state or to the modern Greek administrational/geographical division. Please also bear in mind that the name Macedonia has Greek roots and means Highlands (I am also aware that Kosovo is an Serbian word).